All the latest news from the industry weekly compiled by the editorial team for you free of charge.
This eMail is already registered.
An unexpected error occured.
Please accept our Terms of Use.
Registration successful.
2 Ratings

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING Light construction of power lathe chucks

Sep 20, 2019

To cater to the evolving automotive industry, it is essential to deliver optimised solutions whilst providing lighter chucks for lathes. This article decodes how Schunk competence centre for turning technology and stationary work develops a clamping device with low mass or mass inertia in order to minimise the energy and duration required for acceleration while simultaneously maximising optimisation. - Philipp Schräder, HD, Schunk GmbH & Co KG; Mathias Siber, HD, Schunk GmbH & Co KG

[]

While aiming at lighter chucks for lathes, Schunk meets the requirements of customers for quick and energy efficient component production. For this purpose, Schunk uses ANSYS simulation solutions including optiSLang for topology and parameter optimisation. The company’s wedge hook power chuck ROTA NCE combines lightweight construction, maximum load capacity and innovative design. The lathe chuck was geometrically adapted to the power flow for providing maximum stiffness as well as lightweight requirements. Compared to conventional lathe chucks and depending on the size, the mass inertia could be reduced by up to 40 per cent.

High stiffness at low mass

The aim of the specialists at the company’s competence centre for turning technology and stationary work holding in Mengen was the improvement of the energy management in accordance with DIN EN ISO 50001. They wanted to develop a clamping device with low mass or mass inertia in order to minimise the energy and duration required for acceleration. However, the basic clamping function of the chuck - measured in terms of stiffness and variability - should be fully maintained, if possible, even increased. Also, the desired radial and axial run-out accuracy had to be guaranteed. In this case, the rough structure of the clamping device components was determined with topology optimisation on the basis of the respective force flow. Using the resulting parameter optimisation, dimensions were then varied to identify an optimal geometrical structure. For the final optimisation, eg, of the jaw guidance, a suitable geometric parameterisation is important, since the topology optimisation does not allow a detailed depiction of the contact areas. In parameter optimisation, lift-off and non-linear contacts of the entire chuck assembly can also be modelled and simulated. The properties of the optimised clamping device could be subsequently evaluated by FE analysis and compared with the previously manufactured designs.

Arched structures below jaws

“In ANSYS, we defined an initial model for topology optimisation including the necessary constraints such as forces and bearings”, explains Mathias Siber, Head of Development Clamping Technology, who used the project for his master’s thesis. “The objective function of the optimisation was the maximisation of the stiffness, with mass restriction at 70, 50 and 30 per cent of the initial mass.” In addition, the existing functional areas were marked to exclude them from optimisation (non-design areas) because they should remain in their original shape. The optimisation algorithm then determined the basic geometrical shape according to the mechanical loads and specified mass restrictions. In the chuck body, arched structures below the jaw guide, circular recesses between the guideways and an overall conical chuck contour were created. “The topology optimisation significantly reduced the weight of the lathe chuck which also has a positive effect regarding the load on the spindle bearings”, stated Philipp Schräder, Head of Development Clamping Technology. “In addition, we registered the vault structure resulting from the topology optimisation as a design patent at the German Patent and Trademark Office, in order to protect it as far as possible from unauthorised copying.”

Influence of parameters

After topology optimisation, parameter optimisation was performed on the reconstructed parametric geometry model using sensitivity studies conducted with optiSLang from Dynardo. Thus, the influence of input parameters on the desired output data could be investigated, visualised and evaluated. The subsequently used optimisation algorithm searched for the minimum of the correspondingly defined target function, including reduction of lifting even at high clamping forces. In addition to the chuck body, base and top jaws were also included in the procedure. “Using optiSLang we could figure out how the jaw guidance should look like”, Siber explains. “We analysed which parameter changes would lead to the desired result of little deformation at low weight.” Regarding the base jaw, mass and axial lifting were critical. Here, the parameters ‘depth of the guidance in the chuck body’ and ‘width of the guidance groove’ dominated. The depth of the guidance showed opposite effects, because the deeper the guidance in the chuck body, the lower the lifting effect. On the other hand, the mass of the base jaw increases proportionally.

Multi-objective optimisation

In this case of facilitating the design process, parameters are optimised towards the objective of less lifting at the lowest base jaw mass. The result of this multi-objective optimisation is an optimal depth-width ratio of 2:3 for the base jaw guidance. This allows a very precise examination of the product behaviour with different geometries in order to create a ‘robust’ design. The robustness of the final design was ensured by means of suitable constraints. While the topology optimisation identified the lightest chuck design from the force flow, the parameter optimisation ensured maximum stiffness and reduced notch stresses for the longest possible chuck life. In addition, a numerical stress analysis was conducted according to FKM guidelines.

Prototype meets all requirements

After optimisation, prototypes of each chuck size were produced. Afterwards, they were examined and verified on a test bench with up to 500,000 cycles, which took several months. “Similar to other projects and due to the profound simulation during development, only one prototype per size was required to fully meet the specified requirements”, emphasises Schräder. “Since a prototype test can take several months, for a new development the time saved by the simulation is approximately half a year.” Topology and parameter optimisation made a lightweight chuck possible where the mass was reduced by 30 per cent and the mass inertia by 40 per cent. A 20 per cent lower jaw centrifugal mass caused advantages such as shorter acceleration phases and a lower loss in clamping force under rotational speed. By optimising the parameters in the jaw guidance area, the chuck stiffness was increased while the stress level was reduced at the same time. The result was a 20 per cent increase of the maximum bearable clamping force.

In combination with the reduced jaw centrifugal mass, a possible speed increase of 10 per cent could be achieved. By reducing the time for testing combined with a stress calculation according to the FKM guideline and depending on the sizes, a cost reduction of approx 30 per cent could be reached in the development. As a result, the Schunk ROTA NCE lathe chuck provides the user with ideal conditions for high process dynamics and productivity while using a minimum of energy. Particularly in large-scale production, the energy- and cycle-time efficiency of the chuck leads to significant savings and fulfills the DIN EN ISO 50001 energy management certification.

Image Gallery

  • The axially displaceable piston transmits the force to the base jaws and generates a radial jaw
    movement synchronous to the axis of rotation

  • FE topology optimisation identifies the lightest chuck design from the force flow

Companies related to this article
Related articles